Comparison Of 1984 By George Orwell To The Actual 1984 Essay -- Compar

Comparison Of 1984 By George Orwell To The Actual 1984 Since the onset of the United States, Americans put up always viewed the future in two ways one, as the perfect participation with a perfect establishment, or two, as a commieic underworld where free get out no longer exists and no one is happy. The novel 1984 by George Orwell is a combination of both theories. On the bad side, a communist state exists which is enforced with surveillance technology and loyal patriots. On the good side, however, everyone in the orderliness who was born after the hostile takeover, which converted the once egalitarian government into a communist government, isnt angry about their life, nor do they wish to change any aspect of their life. For the few infidels who exist, it is a maddening existence, of constant course and brainwashing. George Orwells novel was definitely different from the actual 1984, but how different were they? They were different in 3 ways government, society, and thought. 1984 starts out with a so called traitor to the society, Winston Smith, walking through the streets nervously observing the video cameras that ar watching his every move. He makes his way into his apartment and produces a journal from his coat pocket. He thinks that even up this simple act of attempting to keep track of time and history could get him vaporized. This scene portrays the strong grip the government has on its patrons. A person every obeys them, or is killed, or put into a forced labor camp. After Winston starts an illegal affair with a younger woman he gets careless and the party finds out that he has committed what they call thought offensive activitys. A thought crime is the intent to do something illegal but not actually doing it. In Winstons world a thought crime is just as severe as a physical crime. They arrest him and his girlfriend and torture them until they realize what they did was pervert and that they love the party and will never do anything to hurt it again.The two governmental systems were different in a very major way. The actual government of England in 1984 was a democracy. This democracys foundation was made up of a parliament and a prime minister. Most other nations of the time had the same set up. In Orwells novel an oligarchic state existed. Airstrip One, which is the area we call England, was home to Winston and the central government of Oceania (a large natio... ...omething without actually doing it. In Oceania a thought crime is just as bad as a physical crime.The penalty for such an offense is that you are taken to the Ministry of Love, but not killed. You are now brainwashed until you love the Party. Obrien, an inner party member, justifies this by stating that all great nations of the past fell because they killed all people who didnt like them. The Party will never fall because they dont create martyrs. All people they eliminate love the Party when they are finally killed. For example Winston is captured and br ought to the Ministry of Love, he then is brainwashed and released to society when he truly liked the Party. Once he lived in the community for a while longer he is shot in the back of the head. The trains of thought, government, and society of the year 1984 versus George Orwells 1984 are clearly different. After looking at the differences I stated, the reason why most people who have read the book ascertain sorry for Winston should be more apparent than ever. The creation of books with story lines like 1984 help to shape our opinions of how the world should be, and make our views stronger than they have ever been.