Letter to the editor Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Letter to the editor - Assignment ExampleAnd here is how professors lottery suggestion is both unrealistic and unsystematic. Professors Karabels suggestion is, indeed, self-undermining. How, given a lottery programapplied randomly to students who have shown schoolman merit, should such a program guarantee all underprivileged students are equal? Put differently, professors Karabels suggestion is meant to erase profound biases in admission process at selective colleges. Thanks to good intentions. Yet, howcould all at least in theory underprivileged applicants be stand for based on a randomized selection? I do believe admission into colleges, selective or not, should by no means be left to chance and lottery. Why should a student be admitted into her college of choice because she has been, well, lucky enough in a lottery withdrawal, whereas another student who has achieved a similar academic merit be denied admission? This is not even constitutionalIn his very own words, professo r Karabel himself seems unsure of what such a lottery program might lead to Such a lottery would permit the college to determine whether its traditional selection criteria did any better than chance in predicting success in school and in later life my own guess is that lottery admits would be amply perhaps equally represented among the macrocosms most distinguished graduates.True, our current system of admission at colleges and universities is one, as qualified by professor Karabel, that is skewed. However, undermining a faulty system that tends to promote rather than erase existing hierarchies of privilege in our educational system cannot be achieved by a replace which is subject to guessing and uncertain outcomes. subsequently all, how could a collegiate lottery program based on a randomized selection guarantee all underprivileged applicants are adequately represented? That is, how could, say, students of